Data correction
A financial number, a sector classification, a shares-outstanding figure, a corporate action we missed — anything that disagrees with the primary filing.
e.g. "RELIANCE FY24 capex is wrong"
Disputes
YieldIQ's valuations are computed algorithmically. They contain errors. If you spot something wrong - a wrong financial number, a misclassified sector, a model output that diverges materially from consensus, a typo in copy - flag it here. We triage every submission and publish the outcome to /errata.
What you can flag
A financial number, a sector classification, a shares-outstanding figure, a corporate action we missed — anything that disagrees with the primary filing.
e.g. "RELIANCE FY24 capex is wrong"
The inputs look right but the model output diverges materially from consensus or from your own analysis. Tell us the assumption you would change and why.
e.g. "ITC terminal growth set at 5% looks high vs peer FMCG names - 3% fits better, here is why"
A caption is confusing, a label is wrong, a methodology page is out of date, a tooltip is misleading. Small wording fixes count too.
e.g. "The sector-medians explainer is confusing"
Submit
The submit button opens your email client with a structured message pre-filled. We read every email that lands at disputes@yieldiq.in.
We list contributors to corrections on /errata unless you opt out. If you do not want your name published, just say so in the email body.